What are the details of our daily existence? What systems dominate our lives? What meanings can we make of our situation?

This social studies/humanities course will steal from various disciplines - including anthropology, critical theory, cultural studies, economics, futurology, history, philosophy, political science, psychology, and sociology - to help us make sense of our situation.

A major goal of the course will be to focus your attention on your own life. Together we will investigate major systems that create and rule our lives including capitalism, school, family, popular culture, and the US government. And we will figure out how to interpret our lives, and these systems, and the collision of our lives and these systems.

We will detour into the future and the past but our journey will be primarily contemporary.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

HW 9 - Video Project GHIJK

For HW 9 please post a reply to each of the comments you received on your video project. Please use the GHIJK structure (below) as a guide. Your replies should be posted both as HW 9 and as a comment on your triangle partners' blog where they posted their comment to you. This should be posted by Sunday night Oct 4.

G for Gratitude for their comments - consider how much time, energy, thought, insight, humor, good feeling, writing skill they used - find something to appreciate even if only brevity - "I appreciate your funny and warm tone and the accuracy of your summary, which made me feel like you really understood my argument."

H for what was Helpful in their comment - be specific about a place where their comment helped you to reconsider something, address a weakness in your writing, encourage an idea or direction in your work, or just help you feel like someone was offering attention to your thoughts. "Your point about my need to proofread was helpful, but even more useful to me was your question about why we seem to get so much pleasure from the digital-representation-devices."

I for what Insight(s) their comment offered you (from them) or provoked in you (from you) or was shared by the two of you. This is your big chance to expand and clarify and extend and change your original thinking. "I was focused on the stickiness of websites that are constantly changing - really focused on the content of the websites. Your question about pleasure made me realize that the actual act of clicking and seeing new things is like a baby's toy - push button and a sound comes out. Apparently that's inherently satisfying - just like how people pop the bubbles on packaging wrap - even apart from the content of the site. Maybe we'd be on the web almost as much with boring content, but the sites with more quickly changing content just would recruit a higher share of our websurfing time than boring sites?"

J for Joggle - meaning to fit the two pieces - your thoughts and her thoughts into a large shape - you are mainly constructing a respectful awareness of difference to ameliorate the tendency for conversation to homogenize - "It seems like your emphasis is mainly on how these devices alter our consciousness and I'm more interested in why we're involved with them in the first place - you are looking at effect and I'm looking at cause."

K is for Koine (common language) - what's a question that you and the commentor both seem interested in? what's a phrase that you both find meaningful or provacative? this common language can serve as a possible platform for continued collaborative consultation. "You and I - as shown in our posts and our comments for each other - both emphasize the interactivity of the new digital-representational-devices like facebook and texting. How does this interactivity change the experience compared to more passive action like watching TV or listening to an iPod?"

No comments:

Post a Comment